Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field in reducing treatment time: A clinical investigation

  • Wasundhara Ashok Bhad (Patil)
    Address correspondence to: Wasundhara Ashok Bhad (Patil), Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur 440003, Maharashtra, India.
    Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anchal Ashok Karemore
    Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 15, 2022DOI:


      • Overview and comparison of methods to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement.
      • Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF), a device assisted method that can be used for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement, has been reviewed in detail.
      • Application of a removable appliance for orthodontic acceleration.


      The long duration of orthodontic treatment is a major concern for the patient. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in accelerating the orthodontic tooth movement, thus reducing treatment duration.


      Nineteen patients requiring extraction of first premolars were selected for this study. The study design was randomly assigned (sealed envelope randomization) split-mouth design. The rate of individual canine retraction by a nickel-titanium closed-coil spring was done. The experimental side received a PEMF generated by a circuit powered by a watch battery. The circuit was embedded in a removable appliance. Foil was used to obstruct the control side from PEMF exposure. Patients were instructed to wear the appliance for 8-10 hours. Appliance with the device was given from the commencement of canine retraction until the canine retraction of one side was complete. Tooth movement was measured on progress models.


      An average increase of 31% in the rate of tooth movement was observed with the PEMF.


      PEMF is a good option to reduce orthodontic treatment duration.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Skidmore K.J.
        • Brook K.J.
        • Thomson W.M.
        • Harding W.J.
        Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129: 230-238
        • Viwattanatipa N.
        • Charnchairerk S.
        The effectiveness of corticotomy and piezocision on canine retraction: a systematic review.
        Korean J Orthod. 2018; 48: 200-211
        • Madan M.S.
        • Liu Z.J.
        • Gu G.M.
        • King G.J.
        Effects of human relaxin on orthodontic tooth movement and periodontal ligaments in rats.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 8.e1-8.e10
        • Strauch B.
        • Herman C.
        • Dabb R.
        • Ignarro L.J.
        • Pilla A.A.
        Evidence-based use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in clinical plastic surgery.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2009; 29: 135-143
        • Bassett C.A.
        • Mitchell S.N.
        • Norton L.
        • Pilla A.
        Repair of non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 1978; 44: 706-724
        • Gupta A.K.
        • Srivastava K.P.
        • Avasthi S.
        Pulsed electromagnetic stimulation in nonunion of tibial diaphyseal fractures.
        Indian J Orthop. 2009; 43: 156-160
        • Meskens M.W.
        • Stuyck J.A.
        • Feys H.
        • Mulier J.C.
        Treatment of nonunion using pulsed electromagnetic fields: a retrospective follow-up study.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 1990; 56: 483-488
        • Zhang X.
        • Zhang J.
        • Qu X.
        • Wen J.
        Effects of different extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on osteoblasts.
        Electromagn Biol Med. 2007; 26: 167-177
        • Bassett C.A.
        • Mitchell S.N.
        • Gaston S.R.
        Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses.
        JAMA. 1982; 247: 623-628
        • Chang K.
        • Chang W.H.S.
        • Huang S.H.
        • Huang S.M.
        • Shih C.
        Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation affects osteoclast formation by modulation of osteoprotegerin, RANK ligand and macrophage colony-stimulating facto.
        J Orthop Res. 2005; 23: 1308-1314
        • Yuan J.
        • Xin F.
        • Jiang W.
        Underlying signaling pathways and therapeutic applications of pulsed electromagnetic fields in bone repair.
        Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018; 46: 1581-1594
        • Showkatbakhsh R.
        • Jamilian A.
        • Showkatbakhsh M.
        The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the acceleration of tooth movement.
        World J Orthod. 2010; 11: e52-e56
        • Stark T.M.
        • Sinclair P.M.
        Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on orthodontic tooth movement.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91: 91-104
        • Zaffe D.
        • Fraticelli D.
        • Sfondrini M.F.
        • Caielli D.
        • Botticelli A.R.
        Rabbit bone behavior after orthodontic and pulsed low-frequency electromagnetic field treatments.
        Electro- and Magnetobiology. 1998; 17: 87-98
        • Dogru M.
        • Akpolat V.
        • Dogru A.G.
        • Karadede B.
        • Akkurt A.
        • Karadede M.I.
        Examination of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on orthodontic tooth movement in rats.
        Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2014; 28: 118-122