Journal Home
Search for

Volume 137, Issue 2, Page 153 (February 2010)


View previous. 6 of 46 View next.

After 50 years in practice, the evidence is convincing

H.O. Blackwood III

Refers to article:
Myths of orthodontic gnathology
Donald J. Rinchuse, Sanjivan Kandasamy
American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
September 2009 (Vol. 136, Issue 3, Pages 322-330)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (125 KB)

Article Outline

Copyright

I have been in active orthodontic practice for nearly 50 years. During this time, I have seen many different theories for “orthodontic gnathology” and TMD diagnosis and treatment, with each guru espousing his own ideas of how things should be and what our goals should be. I wonder, with all this confusion, how practicing orthodontists have managed to do a fairly decent job for all these years. We have obviously been doing something right.

Rinchuse and Kandasamy have condensed what I learned over a 50-year practice into a simple format with convincing evidence (Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Myths of orthodontic gnathology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:322-9). I agree with their excellent article and wish to congratulate them on the organization of the material.

Shreveport, La

 The viewpoints expressed are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect those of the editor(s), publisher(s), or Association.

PII: S0889-5406(09)01324-9

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.009


View previous. 6 of 46 View next.