Journal Home
Search for

Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages 624.e1-624.e15 (November 2009)


View previous. 12 of 42 View next.

Orthognathic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. Part 1. A new quality-assessment technique and analysis of study characteristics and classifications

Salma Al-RiyamiaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, David R. Molesb, Susan J. Cunninghamc

Received October 2008; received in revised form February 2009; accepted February 2009.

Refers to article:
Editor's Summary and Q&A: Orthognathic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. Part 1. A new quality-assessment technique and analysis of study characteristics and classifications
Salma Al-Riyami, David R. Moles, Susan J. Cunningham
American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
November 2009 (Vol. 136, Issue 5, Pages 624-625)
Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (40 KB)
Introduction

Orthognathic treatment is undertaken to correct jaw discrepancies and involves a combination of orthodontics and surgery. The effects of orthodontic treatment on temporomandibular disorders (TMD) have been widely debated in the literature, but fewer studies focus on the effects of orthognathic treatment on TMD.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to (1) determine the percentage of orthognathic patients with signs or symptoms of TMD, (2) establish the range of signs or symptoms, and (3) examine studies that followed patients longitudinally through treatment to determine the effect of orthognathic intervention on TMD symptoms.

Results

Of 480 identified articles, 53 were eligible for inclusion in this review. Part 1 of this 2-part article describes the methodology of conducting this review, the difficulties encountered (including the quality-assessment issues), and a narrative analysis of study characteristics and classification methods. Part 2 reports the remaining results, evidence tables, and meta-analyses.

Conclusions

The diversity of diagnostic criteria and classification methods used in the included studies makes interstudy comparisons difficult. There is a definitive need for well-designed studies with standardized diagnostic criteria and classification methods for TMD.

a Postgraduate student, Orthodontic Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom

b Former lecturer, Health Services Research; professor of Oral Health Services Research, director of Postgraduate Education and Research, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, United Kingdom

c Senior lecturer/honorary consultant, Orthodontic Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Salma Al-Riyami, Orthodontic Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom.

 The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S0889-5406(09)00600-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.021


View previous. 12 of 42 View next.