American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 135, Issue 1 , Pages 27-35, January 2009

How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign

  • Neal D. Kravitz

      Affiliations

    • Private practice, South Riding, Va, and White Plains, Md, School of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Neal D. Kravitz, University of Illinois, Department of Orthodontics, 801 S Paulina St, MC 841, Chicago, IL 60612
  • ,
  • Budi Kusnoto

      Affiliations

    • Assistant professor and clinical chair, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago
  • ,
  • Ellen BeGole

      Affiliations

    • Associate professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago
  • ,
  • Ales Obrez

      Affiliations

    • Associate professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago
  • ,
  • Brent Agran

      Affiliations

    • Postgraduate student, School of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago

Received March 2007; received in revised form May 2007; accepted May 2007.

Introduction

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of tooth movement with removable polyurethane aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif).

Methods

The study sample included 37 patients treated with Anterior Invisalign. Four hundred one anterior teeth (198 maxillary and 203 mandibular) were measured on the virtual Treat models. The virtual model of the predicted tooth position was superimposed over the virtual model of the achieved tooth position, created from the posttreatment impression, and the 2 models were superimposed over their stationary posterior teeth by using ToothMeasure, Invisalign's proprietary superimposition software. The amount of tooth movement predicted was compared with the amount achieved after treatment. The types of movements studied were expansion, constriction, intrusion, extrusion, mesiodistal tip, labiolingual tip, and rotation.

Results

The mean accuracy of tooth movement with Invisalign was 41%. The most accurate movement was lingual constriction (47.1%), and the least accurate movement was extrusion (29.6%)— specifically, extrusion of the maxillary (18.3%) and mandibular (24.5%) central incisors, followed by mesiodistal tipping of the mandibular canines (26.9%). The accuracy of canine rotation was significantly lower than that of all other teeth, with the exception of the maxillary lateral incisors. At rotational movements greater than 15°, the accuracy of rotation for the maxillary canines fell significantly. Lingual crown tip was significantly more accurate than labial crown tip, particularly for the maxillary incisors. There was no statistical difference in accuracy between maxillary and mandibular teeth of the same tooth type for any movements studied.

Conclusions

We still have much to learn regarding the biomechanics and efficacy of the Invisalign system. A better understanding of Invisalign's ability to move teeth might help the clinician select suitable patients for treatment, guide the proper sequencing of movement, and reduce the need for case refinement.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0889-5406(08)00859-7

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018

American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 135, Issue 1 , Pages 27-35, January 2009